Current evidence and analytical mapping
Typed analytical population remains incomplete. This status concerns exact typed analytical objects only. It never suppresses a library candidate, queue record, citation, source-linked statement, exact context, machine flag, or review note from the public evidence surface.
- All material records
- 18217
- Library document candidates
- 9918
- Candidate-queue records
- 7388
- Countries
- 195
- Cited source records
- 709
- Source-linked statements
- 182
- Mapped country profiles
- 195
- Source-linked mapped findings
- 1975
- Analytical object rows
- 5970
- Linked source versions
- 1938
- Open P0 gates
- 5
- Open P1 gates
- 6
Canonical analytical unit
Actor × Function × Decision × Role × Relationship × Provider or Service × Territory × Time × Evidence
This unit prevents a broad label such as “decentralized” from replacing the underlying questions. A staffing decision can have one actor that sets standards, another that proposes, another that approves, and a provider that implements. All roles may be correct at the same time.
| Dimension | Question answered | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Actor | Who exists and participates? | Ministry, district, purchaser, provider, professional body, community. |
| Function and decision | What activity and material choice are in scope? | Staffing, service mix, capital, procurement, referral organization. |
| Role and relationship | How does each actor participate and connect? | Sets standard, proposes, approves, owns, operates, contracts, supervises, refers. |
| Provider, service, and territory | Where and for which delivery object does it apply? | Primary care, hospital, referral region, purchaser network, catchment. |
| Time and evidence | When did it apply and why is it shown? | Validity interval, reform dates, claim, source version, exact locator. |
Evidence-to-display chain
- 1. Complete materials registerEvery collected library candidate and candidate-queue row enters the public review register with its pipeline stage preserved.
- 2. Source versionRetrieval metadata and immutable SHA-256 identify the exact version.
- 3. Displayed evidenceAll statements, exact contexts, citations, locators, machine flags, and review prompts are public immediately.
- 4. Atomic statementOne independently challengeable proposition remains visible with its source lineage.
- 5. Reviewer annotationA reviewer can challenge source bytes, locator, scope, validity, ontology, duplicates, or conflicts without controlling visibility.
- 6. Structured objectExplicit typed fields populate nodes, edges, matrix cells, pathways, networks, or observations.
- 7. Derived analysisRegistered rules operate only on compatible typed inputs while the full source evidence remains visible.
- 8. Display and exportEvery factual object can reopen its claim, citation, locator, period, and conflict context.
Formal, reported, and observed evidence
| Layer | Meaning | Permitted conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Formal | Legal and policy design established by an appropriate primary source. | What the institutional rule assigns or requires. |
| Reported | A reviewed description or synthesis of how the system is organized. | What an authoritative review reports, with its scope and limitations. |
| Observed | Administrative data, claims, surveys, registries, or implementation studies. | What implementation or patient flow shows for a defined period and denominator. |
A formal referral requirement does not prove compliance. An observed bypass rate does not erase the formal rule. A design-practice result is permitted only when both layers are present.
Domain-level coverage
Coverage is not one overall country score. Each domain reports displayed evidence, direct typed mappings, explicit missingness, territory, and period. A zero direct-mapping count does not mean the institution or relationship is absent, and it never hides the broader evidence.
| Domain | Countries with displayed source or statement evidence | Countries with source-linked mapped evidence | Countries with direct canonical evidence | Current result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actors | 188 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Government responsibilities | 187 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Provider ownership | 26 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Decision rights | 42 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Provider autonomy | 1 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Primary care organization | 181 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Hospital organization | 72 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Referral design | 35 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Observed referral | 1 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Provider networks | 41 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Facility data | 4 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Utilization | 0 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Patient flows | 0 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Governance and accountability | 118 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Market structure | 26 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Reform history | 44 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
| Authoritative review | 70 | 195 | 0 | Explicit mapped evidence exists for part of the registry |
Evidence-readiness scoring
Eight independent dimensions use a 0 to 4 rubric. They assess documentation readiness, not health-system quality or country performance. The dimensions are never added into a composite score and countries are not ranked.
| Dimension | Unit | Score 0 | Score 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain completeness | domains | No controlled domain is represented by displayed evidence. | Fourteen to seventeen domains have verified evidence and every critical domain is covered for the declared scope. |
| Source authority | displayed evidence records | No cited source is available. | Every material claim uses a proposition-appropriate source and required independent corroboration is present. |
| Evidence-layer balance | evidence or source layers | No evidence or source layer is present. | All three modes cover the declared critical questions and disagreements remain explicit. |
| Source traceability | displayed evidence records | No registered source is available. | Every directly typed claim resolves to a versioned source, exact locator or justified exception, citation, and reproducible lineage. |
| Displayed-fact verifiability | displayed statements or exact excerpts | No proposed country statement or exact source excerpt is displayed. | Every fact in the defined scope is an directly mapped atomic claim with exact source lineage, reviewer annotation and validation, and resolved validity. |
| Currency and validity | dated evidence records | No displayed evidence has usable date information. | Critical current claims also pass explicit supersession checks and historical arrangements are periodized. |
| Human review and conflict handling | displayed evidence records | No displayed evidence is available for review. | The declared scope has reviewer annotation and validation, conflict handling, complete availability, and registered independent quality checks. |
| Observed-data depth | observed-data question groups | No displayed source or direct typed evidence covers an observed-data question group. | Repeated or current comparable evidence covers delivery structure, utilization, referral, and patient flow. |
Automatic proof of completeness
These tests inspect every served country pack. A PASS means no currently displayed object violates the rule. Population is a separate gate, so an empty registry cannot use a vacuous integrity PASS to claim completion.
| Test | Result | Rule | Countries failed |
|---|---|---|---|
| orphan_node_test | PASS | Every direct canonical actor node resolves to a direct canonical claim. | 0 |
| orphan_edge_test | PASS | Every direct canonical relationship edge resolves to a direct canonical claim. | 0 |
| orphan_matrix_cell_test | PASS | Every direct canonical decision-right cell resolves to a direct canonical claim. | 0 |
| orphan_narrative_test | PASS | Every direct canonical factual narrative sentence resolves to explicit evidence. | 0 |
| object_lineage_test | PASS | Every other direct canonical object resolves to a direct canonical claim or explicit direct-data record. | 0 |
| citation_lineage_test | PASS | Every direct canonical claim resolves to a cited source version and exact locator. | 0 |
| expired_claim_test | PASS | No current or selected-period result relies on an expired claim. | 0 |
| formal_observed_conflation_test | PASS | Design-practice analysis contains both design and observed evidence layers. | 0 |
| unresolved_conflict_test | PASS | No analysis, narrative, or executive summary silently selects one side of a represented conflict. | 0 |
| display_source_version_test | PASS | Every displayed source-linked record resolves to a cited HTTPS source with an immutable SHA-256 version. | 0 |
| display_claim_lineage_test | PASS | Every displayed source-linked claim resolves to its mapping, cited source, exact locator, and immutable source version. | 0 |
| display_object_lineage_test | PASS | Every displayed analytical mapping and object resolves to its displayed claim, source, and source version. | 0 |
Requirement-by-requirement analytical checks
These checks assess typed analytical coverage, not whether evidence may be shown. An empty structured section does not hide its source-linked records. Evidence gaps remain visible rather than silently inferred.
| Gate | Result | Implementation | Evidence state | Remaining proof |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ontology P0 | PASS | PASS | This is a structural gate; country population is assessed separately. | No open structural requirement. |
| Actor registry P0 | PASS | PASS | 2411 source-linked analytical object rows are displayed across 195 profiles. The separate direct canonical layer is not yet populated. | No open requirement. |
| Relationship registry P0 | PASS | PASS | 1524 source-linked analytical object rows are displayed across 195 profiles. The separate direct canonical layer is not yet populated. | No open requirement. |
| Decision rights P0 | PASS | PASS | 449 source-linked analytical object rows are displayed across 195 profiles. The separate direct canonical layer is not yet populated. | No open requirement. |
| Claim-level citations P0 | PARTIAL | PASS | 1975 displayed mapped findings across 195 profiles retain 3787 exact source references to 1938 immutable versions. The separate direct canonical claim layer is not yet populated. | Extend atomic, locator-complete source-linked mapping to the remaining country profiles. |
| Evidence coverage P0 | PARTIAL | PASS | All 195 packs expose 17 domain states. 709 cited source records cover all countries; 20 countries have source-linked statements or exact context; 195 countries have 1975 displayed source-linked analytical mappings. The separate direct canonical claim layer is not yet populated. | Extend fact-level mapping and record explicit missingness where no qualifying source is available for a country and domain. |
| Formal and observed separation P0 | PARTIAL | PASS | 190 profiles contain both design and observed layers in displayed source-linked mappings. The direct canonical layer does not yet add a design-observed pair. | Populate formal or reported design evidence and observed implementation evidence without merging the layers. |
| Historical versioning P0 | PARTIAL | PASS | 631 source-linked reform object rows are displayed across 192 profiles. The separate direct canonical reform layer is not yet populated. | Populate legal, effective, implementation, and observed dates and close superseded validity intervals. |
| Primary care organization P1 | PASS | PASS | 195 profiles have source-linked mapped primary-care evidence. The separate direct canonical layer is not yet populated for this domain. | No open requirement. |
| Hospital organization P1 | PASS | PASS | 195 profiles have source-linked mapped hospital-organization evidence. The separate direct canonical layer is not yet populated for this domain. | No open requirement. |
| Patient choice and gatekeeping P1 | PARTIAL | PASS | 6 profiles encode patient choice separately from referral requirements in source-linked mappings. 195 profiles have source-linked referral-design mappings overall. | Map choice and gatekeeping evidence separately at primary, specialist, and hospital levels. |
| Referral pathway P1 | PASS | PASS | 195 profiles have source-linked mapped referral-pathway evidence. The separate direct canonical layer is not yet populated for this domain. | No open requirement. |
| Provider autonomy P1 | PARTIAL | PASS | 415 source-linked analytical object rows are displayed across 185 profiles. The separate direct canonical layer is not yet populated. | Map decision-domain autonomy records that identify autonomy from whom. |
| Accountability P1 | PARTIAL | PASS | 73 explicit source-linked accountability edges are displayed across 52 profiles. 415 autonomy cells are displayed across 185 profiles. | Pair autonomy with accountable-to actors and explicit mechanisms. |
| Public and private delivery P1 | PARTIAL | PASS | 256 source-linked public-private findings are displayed across 195 profiles. Denominator-specific direct observations are not yet populated in the canonical layer. | Populate facilities, beds, workforce, visits, admissions, and expenditure separately where evidence permits. |
| Networks and integration P1 | PARTIAL | PASS | 195 profiles have source-linked network mappings. Separate canonical network and integration arrays are not yet populated. | Map network membership, governance, territory, referral rules, information links, and horizontal or vertical mechanisms. |
| Cross-country comparison P1 | FAIL | PASS | The current mapped profiles are visible side by side, but evidence equivalence has not yet been established for a formal cross-country comparison. | Map comparable dimensions for at least two countries without replacing missing fields or denominators. |
| Methods and data dictionary P0 | PASS | PASS | Ontology, evidence hierarchy, inference guardrails, independent readiness rubrics, and automated completion tests are published. | No open structural requirement. Methods must remain synchronized with schema and validators. |
| Crawlable public surface P0 | PASS | PASS | 195 country HTML records, 195 country JSON records, a country index, methods route, robots allowance, and sitemap are present. | No open crawlability requirement. |
| Cross-country manual validation P0 | PARTIAL | PASS | 195 profiles contain displayed source-linked analytical mappings and all displayed records remain open to reviewer annotations. The separate direct canonical claim layer is not yet populated. | Collect reviewer annotations and heterogeneous cross-country challenge testing while keeping every record visible. |
Displayed evidence and the Indonesia review flagship
18217 material-stage records are displayed: 9918 library document candidates, 7388 candidate-queue records, and 911 public-stage records. All 195 countries have materials. Stage duplicates remain visible because each stage is separately reviewable.
Indonesia is the review-workflow flagship because its dossier exposes all 512 assigned materials, statements, citations, locators, source hashes, machine flags, and text-anchored annotation points in one place.
External methodological benchmarks
- WHO primary health care measurement framework, including first contact, empanelment, referral and counter-referral, care pathways, teams, facility management, and community linkage.
- OECD Health Systems Characteristics Survey, including provider ownership, patient choice, gatekeeping, provider relationships, and decentralization.
- European Observatory governance framework, which treats the allocation of governance tasks as function-specific.
- Health Systems in Transition author template, which provides consistent questions, definitions, sources, tables, and figures for country-system description.
- WHO mixed health-system governance strategy, which frames public and private delivery as a relationship and stewardship problem rather than a single ownership share.