Health System Organization Explorer / Country organization profile

Switzerland

Organization and delivery profile covering institutional roles, decision rights, provider relationships, referral pathways, and changes over time.

How the health system is organized

This profile follows the organizational chain from national institutions and subnational authorities to purchasers, provider organizations, referral networks, and people using services.

Reported source

Actors and responsibilities

Cantons plan hospital care, but their ownership, financing and tariff roles vary. Historical ownership material is not a current national ownership snapshot.

Period
Current FOPH and 2026 report; historical review 2015
Territory
Switzerland; arrangements vary by canton
Locator
FOPH Hospital treatment; Federal Council 2026 pages 4-10; HiT 2015.

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Hospital treatment. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/hospital-treatment | Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf | De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content

Open cited source

Formal source

Actors and responsibilities

Swiss health responsibilities are distributed across federal, cantonal and municipal authorities. This is a federal architecture, not a single provider command chain.

Period
Current FOPH page; 2015 review supplies historical context
Territory
Switzerland, with cantonal and municipal variation
Locator
FOPH National health policy; HiT 2015 pages 37-40.

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). National health policy. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/national-health-policy | De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content

Open cited source

Formal source

Decision rights and autonomy

The evidence supports a cantonal planning and hospital-list decision right. It does not allocate every clinical, financial or employment decision to a common hospital authority.

Period
Current FOPH page and 2026 Federal Council report
Territory
Switzerland; cantonal decision structures vary
Locator
FOPH Hospital treatment; Federal Council 2026 pages 4-10.

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Hospital treatment. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/hospital-treatment | Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf

Open cited source

Reported source

Decision rights and autonomy

Cantonal hospital relationships vary, but the reviewed materials do not support a national provider-autonomy score. This is shown as missing comparability, not as low autonomy.

Period
2026 report and historical/current review synthesis
Territory
Switzerland; cantonal and provider variation
Locator
Federal Council 2026 pages 4-10; HSiA 2024 p1; HiT 2015.

Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf | European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Switzerland: Health Systems in Action 2024. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/docs/librariesprovider3/publicationsnew/switzerland---hsia-one-pager.pdf?sfvrsn=d64dbc37_1 | De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content

Open cited source

Reported source

Delivery and referrals

The Swiss delivery system is decentralized, with primary and specialist care not organized as one uniform national pathway. Cantonal and insurance-model variation remains material.

Period
Current national policy page and 2024 synthesis; 2015 context
Territory
Switzerland, retaining cantonal and insurance-model variation
Locator
HSiA 2024 p1; FOPH National health policy; HiT 2015.

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Switzerland: Health Systems in Action 2024. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/docs/librariesprovider3/publicationsnew/switzerland---hsia-one-pager.pdf?sfvrsn=d64dbc37_1 | Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). National health policy. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/national-health-policy | De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content

Open cited source

Observed source

Delivery and referrals

Obsan describes historical inpatient transitions after acute care. These flows cannot be used as measures of outpatient referral adherence, completed care pathways or current coordination quality.

Period
Hospital data 2008-2013; report published 2015
Territory
Switzerland inpatient hospital data
Locator
Obsan treatment chains report pages 1-4.

Swiss Health Observatory (Obsan). Treatment chains in inpatient health care in Switzerland. 2015. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/EwhpCoS5eRaE/behandlungsketten.pdf

Open cited source

Formal source

Relationships and networks

Cantonal hospital lists and insurer contractual relationships structure access and purchasing relationships. They do not prove an integrated national provider network.

Period
Current FOPH page and 2026 report
Territory
Switzerland; cantonal lists may include cross-cantonal providers
Locator
FOPH Hospital treatment; Federal Council 2026 pages 4-10.

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Hospital treatment. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/hospital-treatment | Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf

Open cited source

Formal source

Relationships and networks

GP and HMO models can structure a first-contact and referral pathway, but Switzerland does not have universal mandatory gatekeeping. A 2012-2013 primary-care study records initiated referrals only; it does not establish national completed referral pathways. Reported network designs are time-bounded and heterogeneous.

Period
Current FOPH design; 2011 policy review; 2012-2013 primary-care study
Territory
Switzerland; only insured people choosing relevant models
Locator
FOPH Restricted choice; HSiA 2024 p1; OECD/WHO review pp77-79; Tandjung et al. 2017, Abstract and Methods.

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Health insurance: Restricted choice of providers. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/health-insurance-restricted-choice-of-providers | European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Switzerland: Health Systems in Action 2024. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/docs/librariesprovider3/publicationsnew/switzerland---hsia-one-pager.pdf?sfvrsn=d64dbc37_1 | OECD and World Health Organization. OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Switzerland 2011. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2011/10/oecd-reviews-of-health-systems-switzerland-2011_g1g14ce1/9789264120914-en.pdf | Tandjung R, Morell S, Hanhart A, et al. Referral determinants in Swiss primary care with a special focus on managed care. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0186307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186307

Open cited source

Reported source

Reform and institutional change

Historical reviews describe managed-care development, network design and earlier ownership context. They are retained as time-bounded evidence, not recast as a current national provider-market count.

Period
2011 and 2015 historical reviews
Territory
Switzerland; review evidence is not a current national implementation measure
Locator
HiT 2015 pages 161-174; OECD/WHO review pp77-79.

De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content | OECD and World Health Organization. OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Switzerland 2011. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2011/10/oecd-reviews-of-health-systems-switzerland-2011_g1g14ce1/9789264120914-en.pdf

Open cited source

Reported source

Reform and institutional change

Health2030 identifies coordination in intercantonal and regional hospital planning as a policy concern, and the 2026 Federal Council report documents hospital investment and cantonal planning as current issues. Neither source establishes a shared reform implementation result across all cantons.

Period
Health2030 strategy 2020-2030; Federal Council report 2026
Territory
Switzerland; cantonal arrangements vary
Locator
Federal Council report pages 4-10; Health2030 pages 23-24.

Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf | Swiss Federal Council. Health2030: the Federal Council's health policy strategy for 2020-2030. 2019. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/en/sd-web/kbf9k4UTipCM/strategie-gesundheit2030.pdf

Open cited source

Open the interactive organization graph and national-subnational decision matrix

Methods, evidence, and data

Source traceability, coverage, citations, locators, source versions, and annotation materials are grouped here so the organizational synthesis remains the primary reading flow.

Directly mapped computable objects

Source-linked mappings drive the visible country synthesis and remain open for annotation. Canonical registries are reported separately so a zero in that publication layer is never mistaken for absent evidence.

Structured country layers with explicit fields for analysis
ObjectCountMeaning
Source-linked analytical mappings10Cited mappings rendered across the organization, decision, delivery, network, autonomy, and reform views.
Source-linked analytical object rows41Named graph nodes and edges, function assignments, decision cells, autonomy cells, pathways, and reform events supplied by those mappings.
Actors0Actors with explicit identity, territory, time, and evidence lineage.
Relationships0Evidence-backed actor-to-actor or actor-to-provider edges.
Decision rights0Actor, function, decision, and role assignments.
Provider organizations0Named or typed providers with evidence-backed ownership and management.
Autonomy records0Decision-domain authority paired with an autonomous-from actor.
Accountability records0Accountable-to actor and mechanism.
Referral designs0Formal referral, choice, bypass, and counter-referral arrangements.
Observed flows0Observed referral, bypass, mobility, or network flows.

Source traceability and coverage

These six documentation measures describe the traceability available for displayed materials: domain coverage, public URLs, exact locators, source versions, and typed mappings. They do not measure health-system performance, source truth, institutional quality, or country success. A zero never means that an actor, authority, relationship, service, or activity is absent.

Documentation status: Explicit analytical mappings. All six source-traceability measures meet or exceed 80%. Materials remain open for annotation and country-specific refinement.

Domain leads
100%17 of 17
Source layers
100%3 of 3
Public URLs
100%23 of 23
Exact locators
100%23 of 23
Source versions
100%23 of 23
Typed mapping
100%5 of 5

Traceability gaps to address

  1. Review and annotate the country synthesis
    All six preparation dimensions meet the target. Every source-linked finding and supporting material remains open for correction, qualification, and additional evidence through annotations.

Coverage by organizational domain

Source traceability across all 17 organizational domains
Displayed materials and source traceability by domain
DomainStateMaterialsURLsLocatorsVersionsStatementsContextsTyped
ActorsCriticalDirect typed mapping1414141411116
Government responsibilitiesCriticalDirect typed mapping1515151512126
Provider ownershipCriticalDirect typed mapping7777774
Decision rightsCriticalDirect typed mapping1010101010106
Provider autonomyCriticalDirect typed mapping5555553
Primary care organizationCriticalDirect typed mapping11111111883
Hospital organizationCriticalDirect typed mapping1313131313137
Referral designCriticalDirect typed mapping8888882
Observed referralDirect typed mapping7777773
Provider networksDirect typed mapping1414141414146
Facility dataDirect typed mapping5555553
UtilizationDirect typed mapping6666663
Patient flowsDirect typed mapping7777773
Governance and accountabilityCriticalDirect typed mapping1515151512127
Market structureDirect typed mapping1313131313137
Reform historyCriticalDirect typed mapping6666662
Authoritative reviewDirect typed mapping18181818181810
Materials with the most complete source traceability
  1. Optional insurance-model gatekeeping
    Candidate Analytical Mapping. Readiness checks: 5 of 5.
    material:f598c41d27ca0dea0cff77fa
  2. Health insurance: Restricted choice of providers
    Country Improvement Source Lead. Readiness checks: 5 of 5.
    material:e949e8b8b0ebb153b7c20ce7
  3. Hospital investment and cantonal hospital planning
    Country Improvement Source Lead. Readiness checks: 5 of 5.
    material:dbd8d07057465b84b658a59e
  4. Distributed federal, cantonal and municipal responsibilities
    Candidate Analytical Mapping. Readiness checks: 5 of 5.
    material:c6c581a0380f04aa218f3870
  5. Switzerland: health system review 2015
    Country Improvement Source Lead. Readiness checks: 5 of 5.
    material:c5ff991df3ed33a657b1ffaf

Complete country materials

Every collected library candidate, queue record, source lead, statement, context, machine flag, and public projection assigned to this country is rendered below. Each item remains open for text-anchored annotation. A missing direct analytical mapping never hides the broader material.

All material records
23
Library documents
0
Queue records
22
Public-stage records
1
Cited source records
1
Source-linked statements
0
Exact contexts
0
Structured source-linked findings
10
Direct typed relationships
0

All collected materials

23 records are rendered in full. Stage duplicates remain visible because a document candidate, triage record, statement, and exact context are separately annotatable objects.

Candidate Analytical Mapping · Open for annotation

Cantonal decision right over hospital planning

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Hospital treatment. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/hospital-treatment | Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf

Statement or annotation question

The evidence supports a cantonal planning and hospital-list decision right. It does not allocate every clinical, financial or employment decision to a common hospital authority.

Source context or anchor

Cantons are obliged to plan hospital care
Material reference
material:50a7427709320ee89518b33e
Pipeline stage
Candidate-Analytical-Mappings
Evidence mode
Formal
Publication date
not supplied
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; cantonal decision structures vary
Period
Current FOPH page and 2026 Federal Council report
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Actors, Authoritative review, Decision rights, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Hospital organization, Market structure, Provider networks
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Description
FOPH Hospital treatment; Federal Council 2026 pages 4-10.
Detected Media Type
text/html
Response Sha256
f091c4f22405b09ac871430c79eff03e68defb8de35c845221f88da91227e86a

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Do not infer hospital-wide operational authority from planning authority.

Source links

Candidate Analytical Mapping · Open for annotation

Cantonal hospital planning with varied institutional roles

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Hospital treatment. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/hospital-treatment | Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf | De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content

Statement or annotation question

Cantons plan hospital care, but their ownership, financing and tariff roles vary. Historical ownership material is not a current national ownership snapshot.

Source context or anchor

Cantons are obliged to plan hospital care
Material reference
material:3924d549cf5a03671147479b
Pipeline stage
Candidate-Analytical-Mappings
Evidence mode
Reported
Publication date
not supplied
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; arrangements vary by canton
Period
Current FOPH and 2026 report; historical review 2015
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Actors, Authoritative review, Decision rights, Facility data, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Hospital organization, Market structure, Provider ownership
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Description
FOPH Hospital treatment; Federal Council 2026 pages 4-10; HiT 2015.
Detected Media Type
text/html
Response Sha256
f091c4f22405b09ac871430c79eff03e68defb8de35c845221f88da91227e86a

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Do not calculate a national public-private ownership share from these sources.

Source links

Candidate Analytical Mapping · Open for annotation

Decentralized delivery with independent provider organization

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Switzerland: Health Systems in Action 2024. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/docs/librariesprovider3/publicationsnew/switzerland---hsia-one-pager.pdf?sfvrsn=d64dbc37_1 | Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). National health policy. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/national-health-policy | De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content

Statement or annotation question

The Swiss delivery system is decentralized, with primary and specialist care not organized as one uniform national pathway. Cantonal and insurance-model variation remains material.

Source context or anchor

decentralised health system with 26 cantons
Material reference
material:6e5a201cd9d955ec34ef14c7
Pipeline stage
Candidate-Analytical-Mappings
Evidence mode
Reported
Publication date
not supplied
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland, retaining cantonal and insurance-model variation
Period
Current national policy page and 2024 synthesis; 2015 context
Source layers
Review Literature
Coverage domains
Actors, Authoritative review, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Hospital organization, Market structure, Provider networks, Primary care organization
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Description
HSiA 2024 p1; FOPH National health policy; HiT 2015.
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
c92c32bd2f7cbfeff3b8fab23db0444b9fc2255f2bf3b1f7da6d005fe9c97596
Page Count
1
Response Sha256
c92c32bd2f7cbfeff3b8fab23db0444b9fc2255f2bf3b1f7da6d005fe9c97596

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Do not substitute this synthesis for a canton-specific care-pathway map.

Source links

Candidate Analytical Mapping · Open for annotation

Distributed federal, cantonal and municipal responsibilities

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). National health policy. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/national-health-policy | De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content

Statement or annotation question

Swiss health responsibilities are distributed across federal, cantonal and municipal authorities. This is a federal architecture, not a single provider command chain.

Source context or anchor

Duties and responsibilities for Swiss healthcare are divided among
Material reference
material:c6c581a0380f04aa218f3870
Pipeline stage
Candidate-Analytical-Mappings
Evidence mode
Formal
Publication date
not supplied
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland, with cantonal and municipal variation
Period
Current FOPH page; 2015 review supplies historical context
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Actors, Authoritative review, Decision rights, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Provider networks
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Description
FOPH National health policy; HiT 2015 pages 37-40.
Detected Media Type
text/html
Response Sha256
25652300481f925cc81acffa582b3f771b7e3b4ac4ca5394b2d248b11911e24e

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • National variation must remain visible.

Source links

Candidate Analytical Mapping · Open for annotation

Historical managed-care and ownership context

De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content | OECD and World Health Organization. OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Switzerland 2011. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2011/10/oecd-reviews-of-health-systems-switzerland-2011_g1g14ce1/9789264120914-en.pdf

Statement or annotation question

Historical reviews describe managed-care development, network design and earlier ownership context. They are retained as time-bounded evidence, not recast as a current national provider-market count.

Source context or anchor

cantons are responsible for hospital planning
Material reference
material:b7a211ed48cc1b0ea4d1228c
Pipeline stage
Candidate-Analytical-Mappings
Evidence mode
Reported
Publication date
not supplied
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; review evidence is not a current national implementation measure
Period
2011 and 2015 historical reviews
Source layers
Review Literature
Coverage domains
Authoritative review, Provider autonomy, Market structure, Observed referral, Provider ownership, Patient flows, Primary care organization, Referral design, Reform history, Utilization
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Description
HiT 2015 pages 161-174; OECD/WHO review pp77-79.
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
0a6fea590724accdd66069de40c6c8581b356c2becb149ce6010d10a5799be23
Page Count
323
Response Sha256
0a6fea590724accdd66069de40c6c8581b356c2becb149ce6010d10a5799be23

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Do not claim national current ownership or referral performance.

Source links

Candidate Analytical Mapping · Open for annotation

Hospital investment and planning as a current policy issue

Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf | Swiss Federal Council. Health2030: the Federal Council's health policy strategy for 2020-2030. 2019. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/en/sd-web/kbf9k4UTipCM/strategie-gesundheit2030.pdf

Statement or annotation question

Health2030 identifies coordination in intercantonal and regional hospital planning as a policy concern, and the 2026 Federal Council report documents hospital investment and cantonal planning as current issues. Neither source establishes a shared reform implementation result across all cantons.

Source context or anchor

Cantons have multiple roles in hospital provision
Material reference
material:1ca1d2f9d4257637a699d693
Pipeline stage
Candidate-Analytical-Mappings
Evidence mode
Reported
Publication date
not supplied
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; cantonal arrangements vary
Period
Health2030 strategy 2020-2030; Federal Council report 2026
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Authoritative review, Provider autonomy, Decision rights, Facility data, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Hospital organization, Market structure, Provider ownership, Reform history
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Description
Federal Council report pages 4-10; Health2030 pages 23-24.
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
c6648c90504d6a4623fefb8890fe5741c53333e0b009e0b18358c60b4e0bf71d
Page Count
89
Response Sha256
c6648c90504d6a4623fefb8890fe5741c53333e0b009e0b18358c60b4e0bf71d

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Do not treat a policy report as a common completed cantonal reform.

Source links

Candidate Analytical Mapping · Open for annotation

Hospital lists and contractual-provider relationships

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Hospital treatment. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/hospital-treatment | Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf

Statement or annotation question

Cantonal hospital lists and insurer contractual relationships structure access and purchasing relationships. They do not prove an integrated national provider network.

Source context or anchor

contractual hospitals have arrangements with insurers
Material reference
material:4615c5f6b05a8186b0a1c98c
Pipeline stage
Candidate-Analytical-Mappings
Evidence mode
Formal
Publication date
not supplied
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; cantonal lists may include cross-cantonal providers
Period
Current FOPH page and 2026 report
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Actors, Authoritative review, Decision rights, Governance and accountability, Hospital organization, Market structure, Provider networks, Provider ownership
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Description
FOPH Hospital treatment; Federal Council 2026 pages 4-10.
Detected Media Type
text/html
Response Sha256
f091c4f22405b09ac871430c79eff03e68defb8de35c845221f88da91227e86a

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Do not interpret a listed or contractual relationship as common ownership.

Source links

Candidate Analytical Mapping · Open for annotation

Observed inpatient transitions, not referral adherence

Swiss Health Observatory (Obsan). Treatment chains in inpatient health care in Switzerland. 2015. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/EwhpCoS5eRaE/behandlungsketten.pdf

Statement or annotation question

Obsan describes historical inpatient transitions after acute care. These flows cannot be used as measures of outpatient referral adherence, completed care pathways or current coordination quality.

Source context or anchor

hospital data from 2008 to 2013
Material reference
material:1f4d1fba6ebcf913cef35875
Pipeline stage
Candidate-Analytical-Mappings
Evidence mode
Observed
Publication date
not supplied
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland inpatient hospital data
Period
Hospital data 2008-2013; report published 2015
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Authoritative review, Facility data, Hospital organization, Provider networks, Observed referral, Patient flows, Utilization
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Description
Obsan treatment chains report pages 1-4.
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
ef0a91158160ea327a9bde90b2cfe716b34e8d6a7cb0f7534e8bf7c2aad49edc
Page Count
4
Response Sha256
ef0a91158160ea327a9bde90b2cfe716b34e8d6a7cb0f7534e8bf7c2aad49edc

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Keep the inpatient and historical boundary visible.

Source links

Candidate Analytical Mapping · Open for annotation

Optional insurance-model gatekeeping

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Health insurance: Restricted choice of providers. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/health-insurance-restricted-choice-of-providers | European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Switzerland: Health Systems in Action 2024. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/docs/librariesprovider3/publicationsnew/switzerland---hsia-one-pager.pdf?sfvrsn=d64dbc37_1 | OECD and World Health Organization. OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Switzerland 2011. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2011/10/oecd-reviews-of-health-systems-switzerland-2011_g1g14ce1/9789264120914-en.pdf | Tandjung R, Morell S, Hanhart A, et al. Referral determinants in Swiss primary care with a special focus on managed care. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0186307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186307

Statement or annotation question

GP and HMO models can structure a first-contact and referral pathway, but Switzerland does not have universal mandatory gatekeeping. A 2012-2013 primary-care study records initiated referrals only; it does not establish national completed referral pathways. Reported network designs are time-bounded and heterogeneous.

Source context or anchor

patients are always required except in an emergency
Material reference
material:f598c41d27ca0dea0cff77fa
Pipeline stage
Candidate-Analytical-Mappings
Evidence mode
Formal
Publication date
not supplied
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; only insured people choosing relevant models
Period
Current FOPH design; 2011 policy review; 2012-2013 primary-care study
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Authoritative review, Market structure, Provider networks, Observed referral, Patient flows, Primary care organization, Referral design, Utilization
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Description
FOPH Restricted choice; HSiA 2024 p1; OECD/WHO review pp77-79; Tandjung et al. 2017, Abstract and Methods.
Detected Media Type
text/html
Response Sha256
b985a9d759f2b2ef7bcc1441310f05c819767e915b072405302bb76ce4c1979b

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Do not label model-specific rules as nationwide referral completion.

Source links

Candidate Analytical Mapping · Open for annotation

Provider autonomy remains an explicit evidence boundary

Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf | European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Switzerland: Health Systems in Action 2024. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/docs/librariesprovider3/publicationsnew/switzerland---hsia-one-pager.pdf?sfvrsn=d64dbc37_1 | De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content

Statement or annotation question

Cantonal hospital relationships vary, but the reviewed materials do not support a national provider-autonomy score. This is shown as missing comparability, not as low autonomy.

Source context or anchor

Cantons have multiple roles in hospital provision
Material reference
material:0610878334ec1ba3167b3959
Pipeline stage
Candidate-Analytical-Mappings
Evidence mode
Reported
Publication date
not supplied
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; cantonal and provider variation
Period
2026 report and historical/current review synthesis
Source layers
Review Literature
Coverage domains
Actors, Authoritative review, Provider autonomy, Decision rights, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Hospital organization
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Description
Federal Council 2026 pages 4-10; HSiA 2024 p1; HiT 2015.
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
c6648c90504d6a4623fefb8890fe5741c53333e0b009e0b18358c60b4e0bf71d
Page Count
89
Response Sha256
c6648c90504d6a4623fefb8890fe5741c53333e0b009e0b18358c60b4e0bf71d

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Do not replace the boundary with High, Medium or Low autonomy.

Source links

Country Improvement Source Lead · Open for annotation

Health insurance: Restricted choice of providers

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Health insurance: Restricted choice of providers. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/health-insurance-restricted-choice-of-providers

Statement or annotation question

FOPH describes GP and HMO insurance models that restrict provider choice. In the GP model, an insured person normally sees their GP first, who decides on specialist consultation; this is model-specific and does not create universal national gatekeeping.

Source context or anchor

patients are always required except in an emergency
Material reference
material:e949e8b8b0ebb153b7c20ce7
Pipeline stage
Country-Evidence-Improvement-Sources
Evidence mode
Formal
Publication date
2026
Institution
Federal Office of Public Health
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Swiss compulsory insurance models; optional GP and HMO models
Period
Current page retrieved August 2026
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Authoritative review, Market structure, Provider networks, Patient flows, Primary care organization, Referral design
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Locator Type
html_text_anchor
Source Word Anchor
patients are always required (except in an emergency) to consult their own GP first
Source Word Count
12
Detected Media Type
text/html
Response Sha256
b985a9d759f2b2ef7bcc1441310f05c819767e915b072405302bb76ce4c1979b

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Keep territorial, time and claim boundaries visible. Do not infer unmeasured national uniformity.

Source links

Country Improvement Source Lead · Open for annotation

Health2030: the Federal Council's health policy strategy for 2020-2030

Swiss Federal Council. Health2030: the Federal Council's health policy strategy for 2020-2030. 2019. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/en/sd-web/kbf9k4UTipCM/strategie-gesundheit2030.pdf

Statement or annotation question

Health2030 identifies insufficient coordination in intercantonal and regional hospital planning and specifies coordinated care as a line of action. It is a federal policy framework, not evidence that implementation or effects are uniform across cantons.

Source context or anchor

lack of coordination in hospital planning
Material reference
material:72959627c88df99a741b9994
Pipeline stage
Country-Evidence-Improvement-Sources
Evidence mode
Formal
Publication date
2019
Institution
Swiss Federal Council
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; federal strategy addresses intercantonal and regional planning context
Period
Strategy adopted 2019 for the 2020-2030 period
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Authoritative review, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Hospital organization, Provider networks, Reform history
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Locator Type
pdf_page_anchor
Source Word Anchor
lack of coordination in hospital planning at intercantonal and regional level
Source Word Count
11
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
0a60cad3ae4c031232527c5d024cd1986e335df321ab8376e297873aab5afcb9
Page Count
27
Response Sha256
0a60cad3ae4c031232527c5d024cd1986e335df321ab8376e297873aab5afcb9

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Treat the strategy as a federal policy framework. Do not infer cantonal implementation, outcomes or uniformity.

Source links

Country Improvement Source Lead · Open for annotation

Hospital investment and cantonal hospital planning

Swiss Federal Council. Investments by Swiss hospitals and cantonal hospital planning. 2026. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/qsUvJJv1r6Nh/Investitionen%20der%20Schweizer%20Spit%C3%A4ler%20und%20kantonale%20Spitalplanung.pdf

Statement or annotation question

The Federal Council report describes cantons as hospital planners, financiers, owners and tariff partners in varying combinations. It supports role variation and multiple cantonal relationships to hospitals, but not one comparable national provider-autonomy rating.

Source context or anchor

Cantons have multiple roles in hospital provision
Material reference
material:dbd8d07057465b84b658a59e
Pipeline stage
Country-Evidence-Improvement-Sources
Evidence mode
Reported
Publication date
2026
Institution
Swiss Federal Council
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; cantonal arrangements vary
Period
2026 report; pages 4 to 10 describe contemporary institutional arrangements and historical context
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Actors, Provider autonomy, Decision rights, Facility data, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Hospital organization, Market structure, Provider ownership, Reform history
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Locator Type
pdf_page_anchor
Source Word Anchor
cantonal responsibility, planning authority, ownership, tariff and financing
Source Word Count
9
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
c6648c90504d6a4623fefb8890fe5741c53333e0b009e0b18358c60b4e0bf71d
Page Count
89
Response Sha256
c6648c90504d6a4623fefb8890fe5741c53333e0b009e0b18358c60b4e0bf71d

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Keep territorial, time and claim boundaries visible. Do not infer unmeasured national uniformity.

Source links

Country Improvement Source Lead · Open for annotation

Hospital treatment

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Hospital treatment. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/hospital-treatment

Statement or annotation question

FOPH states that cantons plan hospital care and issue hospital lists; listed hospitals may include cross-cantonal providers, while contractual hospitals have arrangements with insurers. This establishes a cantonal planning and purchasing context, not a single national network.

Source context or anchor

Cantons are obliged to plan hospital care
Material reference
material:0bec360360147ddca0afcebd
Pipeline stage
Country-Evidence-Improvement-Sources
Evidence mode
Formal
Publication date
2026
Institution
Federal Office of Public Health
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; hospital planning and lists are cantonal
Period
Current page retrieved August 2026
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Actors, Decision rights, Government responsibilities, Hospital organization, Market structure, Provider networks, Provider ownership, Referral design
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Locator Type
html_text_anchor
Source Word Anchor
Cantons are obliged to plan hospital care
Source Word Count
7
Detected Media Type
text/html
Response Sha256
f091c4f22405b09ac871430c79eff03e68defb8de35c845221f88da91227e86a

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Keep territorial, time and claim boundaries visible. Do not infer unmeasured national uniformity.

Source links

Country Improvement Source Lead · Open for annotation

Hospital treatment chains in Switzerland

Swiss Health Observatory (Obsan). Treatment chains in inpatient health care in Switzerland. 2015. https://www.bag.admin.ch/dam/de/sd-web/EwhpCoS5eRaE/behandlungsketten.pdf

Statement or annotation question

Obsan reports observed post-acute inpatient transitions to rehabilitation, psychiatry, nursing care, Spitex and readmission using 2008-2013 hospital data. These are inpatient transition patterns, not evidence of outpatient referral adherence or care coordination quality.

Source context or anchor

hospital data from 2008 to 2013
Material reference
material:ad7ff6fe92e2bd2722f53ad7
Pipeline stage
Country-Evidence-Improvement-Sources
Evidence mode
Observed
Publication date
2015
Institution
Swiss Health Observatory
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; inpatient hospital data
Period
Hospital data from 2008-2013; published 2015
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Authoritative review, Facility data, Hospital organization, Provider networks, Observed referral, Patient flows, Utilization
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Locator Type
pdf_page_anchor
Source Word Anchor
acute-to-rehabilitation, psychiatry, nursing, Spitex and readmission transitions
Source Word Count
8
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
ef0a91158160ea327a9bde90b2cfe716b34e8d6a7cb0f7534e8bf7c2aad49edc
Page Count
4
Response Sha256
ef0a91158160ea327a9bde90b2cfe716b34e8d6a7cb0f7534e8bf7c2aad49edc

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Keep territorial, time and claim boundaries visible. Do not infer unmeasured national uniformity.

Source links

Country Improvement Source Lead · Open for annotation

National health policy

Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). National health policy. https://www.bag.admin.ch/en/national-health-policy

Statement or annotation question

FOPH describes health responsibilities as divided among federal, cantonal and municipal authorities and frames national policy as coordination across those levels rather than a unitary delivery hierarchy.

Source context or anchor

Duties and responsibilities for Swiss healthcare are divided among
Material reference
material:3c20c1d283f5675ec913ddf1
Pipeline stage
Country-Evidence-Improvement-Sources
Evidence mode
Formal
Publication date
2026
Institution
Federal Office of Public Health
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland, with federal, cantonal and municipal responsibilities
Period
Current page retrieved August 2026
Source layers
Official
Coverage domains
Actors, Authoritative review, Decision rights, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Provider networks, Reform history
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Locator Type
html_text_anchor
Source Word Anchor
Duties and responsibilities for Swiss healthcare are divided among the federal, cantonal and municipal authorities
Source Word Count
10
Detected Media Type
text/html
Response Sha256
25652300481f925cc81acffa582b3f771b7e3b4ac4ca5394b2d248b11911e24e

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Keep territorial, time and claim boundaries visible. Do not infer unmeasured national uniformity.

Source links

Country Improvement Source Lead · Open for annotation

OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Switzerland 2011

OECD and World Health Organization. OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Switzerland 2011. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2011/10/oecd-reviews-of-health-systems-switzerland-2011_g1g14ce1/9789264120914-en.pdf

Statement or annotation question

The review describes managed-care plans and integrated-care networks that can use GP gatekeeping, restricted networks and referral arrangements. It reports historical network design rather than a current national referral-completion or autonomy measure.

Source context or anchor

referral to a specialist is usually necessary
Material reference
material:69e5cdb13c6425f7304dca7e
Pipeline stage
Country-Evidence-Improvement-Sources
Evidence mode
Reported
Publication date
2011
Institution
OECD and World Health Organization
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; managed-care network arrangements discussed in a 2011 policy review
Period
Review published 2011, principally using 2009-2010 evidence
Source layers
Grey Literature
Coverage domains
Authoritative review, Market structure, Provider networks, Observed referral, Patient flows, Primary care organization, Referral design, Utilization
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Locator Type
pdf_page_anchor
Source Word Anchor
referral to a specialist is usually necessary
Source Word Count
7
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
cf9a154ee84c4c2874312a4a8e791758992d196a5f7af8c12b33fe32d4fe1213
Page Count
159
Response Sha256
cf9a154ee84c4c2874312a4a8e791758992d196a5f7af8c12b33fe32d4fe1213

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Treat network arrangements as historical and heterogeneous. Do not infer current national referral completion or provider autonomy.

Source links

Country Improvement Source Lead · Open for annotation

Referral determinants in Swiss primary care with a special focus on managed care

Tandjung R, Morell S, Hanhart A, et al. Referral determinants in Swiss primary care with a special focus on managed care. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0186307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186307. Full text: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/europepmc/webservices/rest/PMC5675398/fullTextXML

Statement or annotation question

A cross-sectional Swiss primary-care study recorded initiated referrals during 2012-2013 and examined voluntary managed-care-plan membership. Its sample cannot estimate national completed referral pathways, referral quality or current model uptake.

Source context or anchor

no mandatory gatekeeping mechanisms exists
Material reference
material:12e98258340c101b320ef693
Pipeline stage
Country-Evidence-Improvement-Sources
Evidence mode
Observed
Publication date
2017
Institution
PLOS ONE
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Swiss primary-care sample; 90 participating primary-care physicians, not a census of all Swiss pathways
Period
Consultations and referrals recorded in 2012-2013; article published 2017
Source layers
Research Literature
Coverage domains
Authoritative review, Observed referral, Patient flows, Primary care organization, Referral design, Utilization
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Locator Type
xml_section_anchor
Source Word Anchor
In the Swiss healthcare system, no mandatory gatekeeping mechanisms exists
Source Word Count
10
Detected Media Type
application/xml
Response Sha256
1d81a83706d2601b2ea93de0ea53adc26fdbd4d7c75a7ea336a61cb50d9865c9

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Keep the 2012-2013 sample boundary visible. Do not infer national referral completion, quality or current prevalence.

Source links

Country Improvement Source Lead · Open for annotation

Switzerland: Health Systems in Action 2024

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Switzerland: Health Systems in Action 2024. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/docs/librariesprovider3/publicationsnew/switzerland---hsia-one-pager.pdf?sfvrsn=d64dbc37_1

Statement or annotation question

The 2024 Observatory profile characterizes Switzerland as decentralized, with independently organized primary and specialist care and insurance models that can restrict choice. It is a national synthesis, not a uniform cantonal operating model.

Source context or anchor

decentralised health system with 26 cantons
Material reference
material:513af049d997efd4cbad720a
Pipeline stage
Country-Evidence-Improvement-Sources
Evidence mode
Reported
Publication date
2024
Institution
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland national synthesis; cantonal and insurance-model variation retained
Period
2024 profile; publication date in source metadata
Source layers
Review Literature
Coverage domains
Actors, Authoritative review, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Hospital organization, Market structure, Provider networks, Primary care organization, Referral design
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Locator Type
pdf_page_anchor
Source Word Anchor
decentralised system, primary and specialist care, insurance-model context
Source Word Count
8
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
c92c32bd2f7cbfeff3b8fab23db0444b9fc2255f2bf3b1f7da6d005fe9c97596
Page Count
1
Response Sha256
c92c32bd2f7cbfeff3b8fab23db0444b9fc2255f2bf3b1f7da6d005fe9c97596

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Keep territorial, time and claim boundaries visible. Do not infer unmeasured national uniformity.

Source links

Country Improvement Source Lead · Open for annotation

Switzerland: health system review 2015

De Pietro C, Camenzind P, Sturny I, et al. Switzerland: health system review 2015. Health Systems in Transition 2015;17(4):1-288. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3a599b2-18d2-43ac-ad07-2fb04820e486/content

Statement or annotation question

The 2015 review describes federal and cantonal functions, cantonal licensing and hospital planning, high choice and managed-care development. Its provider-ownership and pathway descriptions are historical context and must not be presented as a current national inventory.

Source context or anchor

cantons are responsible for hospital planning
Material reference
material:c5ff991df3ed33a657b1ffaf
Pipeline stage
Country-Evidence-Improvement-Sources
Evidence mode
Reported
Publication date
2015
Institution
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
Switzerland; historical national synthesis with cantonal variation
Period
2015 review; historical contextual source, not a current performance or ownership census
Source layers
Review Literature
Coverage domains
Actors, Authoritative review, Provider autonomy, Decision rights, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Hospital organization, Market structure, Provider networks, Provider ownership, Primary care organization, Referral design, Reform history
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Previous Boundary Detected
False
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Locator Type
pdf_page_anchor
Source Word Anchor
federalism, cantonal licensing and hospital planning, managed care
Source Word Count
11
Detected Media Type
application/pdf
File Sha256
0a6fea590724accdd66069de40c6c8581b356c2becb149ce6010d10a5799be23
Page Count
323
Response Sha256
0a6fea590724accdd66069de40c6c8581b356c2becb149ce6010d10a5799be23

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Keep territorial, time and claim boundaries visible. Do not infer unmeasured national uniformity.

Source links

Displayed source projection · Open for annotation

Switzerland: health system review 2015

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Switzerland: health system review 2015. 2015. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/countries/switzerland

Material reference
candidate-source:CHE:23180a061b1479f98262
Pipeline stage
Current-Public-Source-Projection
Evidence mode
Not classified
Publication date
2015
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Candidate Source Metadata
Territory
not supplied
Period
Not supplied
Source layers
Candidate Source Metadata, Official
Coverage domains
Actors, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Primary care organization, Service Delivery
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Page Locator Linked From Locator Gap Acquisition
True
Previous Visibility
Previously projected
Heading
Country overview
Html Text Block
8
Locator Type
html_text_anchor
Source Word Anchor
since 1996 The Swiss health system is highly decentralized The federal level
Source Word Count
12
Response Sha256
d96887c0b688bd4306ef5ff23a5f7646aab3eb1ae443af8b81dde88f8cbbc952

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Public source projection retained as a distinct stage record.
  • A recoverable source locator was retrieved from this exact public source URL in the locator-gap traceability audit.

Source links

Source Triage Record · Open for annotation

Switzerland: health system review 2015

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Switzerland: health system review 2015. 2015. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/countries/switzerland

Material reference
material:e55d5400b0678e358db22ada
Pipeline stage
Global-Source-Triage-Queue
Evidence mode
Not classified
Publication date
2015
Institution
not supplied
Document type
Not Supplied
Territory
not supplied
Period
Not supplied
Source layers
Who European Observatory
Coverage domains
Actors, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Primary care organization, Service Delivery
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Page Locator Linked From Locator Gap Acquisition
True
Previous Boundary Detected
True
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Earlier source-record status
Open for annotation
Heading
Country overview
Html Text Block
8
Locator Type
html_text_anchor
Source Word Anchor
since 1996 The Swiss health system is highly decentralized The federal level
Source Word Count
12
Response Sha256
d96887c0b688bd4306ef5ff23a5f7646aab3eb1ae443af8b81dde88f8cbbc952

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Verify the exact bibliographic citation against the original source.
  • Confirm that the document applies to the named country and intended territorial scope.
  • Confirm document type, issuing institution, authority, and claim-specific suitability.
  • Retrieve and hash the exact source version when it is not already verified.
  • Check publication date, effective period, currency, and supersession risk.
  • Confirm only domains directly supported by the reviewed source.
  • Add substantive feedback directly through the text-anchored annotation layer.
  • A recoverable source locator was retrieved from this exact public source URL in the locator-gap traceability audit.

Source links

Targeted Source Lead · Open for annotation

Switzerland: health system review 2015

European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Switzerland: health system review 2015. 2015. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/countries/switzerland

Material reference
material:664be25a4c438f2e22352d1c
Pipeline stage
Targeted-Gap-Source-Leads
Evidence mode
Not classified
Publication date
2015-10-04
Institution
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
Document type
Health System Review
Territory
not supplied
Period
Not supplied
Source layers
Not supplied
Coverage domains
Actors, Governance and accountability, Government responsibilities, Primary care organization, Service Delivery
Current display status
Shown in full and open for annotation
Page Locator Linked From Locator Gap Acquisition
True
Previous Boundary Detected
True
Previous Visibility
Previously not projected
Earlier source-record status
Unreviewed
Source Version Linked From Locator Gap Acquisition
True
Status
Candidate
Heading
Country overview
Html Text Block
8
Locator Type
html_text_anchor
Source Word Anchor
since 1996 The Swiss health system is highly decentralized The federal level
Source Word Count
12
Detected Media Type
text/html
Response Sha256
d8ca7940073c690fe345646b7061cacff639cf7f45b50d53edeaa7dd1e220fb9

Annotation prompts and machine flags

  • Authoritative official source page or publication exposes country-specific health-system organization, governance, delivery, or primary-care context.
  • Immutable source-version metadata was retrieved from this exact public source URL in the locator-gap traceability audit.
  • A recoverable source locator was retrieved from this exact public source URL in the locator-gap traceability audit.

Source links